Senin, 30 November 2009

Controversy of National Examination

Should National Examination be abolished?

National Examination is needed by the government to measure quality standard of education in national level but it will emerge some problems when it is used to judge whether a certain student can pass or not. Some people say that the graduation based on the result of the National Examination tends to deappreciate students’ and teachers’ works during 3 years. As if their hard efforts were not included into account to judge the students’ graduation. Nowdays there are pro and contra opinion about it whether it will be abolished or continued. What do you think about it? Do you agree or disagree? Deliver your opinion!

47 komentar:

  1. i think national examination should be abolished bcause determining our success of da whole 3 years we've spent in senior high just by passing da 6-day-exams isnt a wise decision. y? well i hav some reasons fer dat.

    1st, national examination doesnt guarantee dat da students wud do da test honestly by their own. as wat i witnessed in da national examinations i've joined before, IT'S TRUE "DA STUDENTS DIDNT DO DA TEST HONESTLY ALL BY THEMSELVES". they cheated by asking their friends, using mobile phone, nd moreover depending on DEADLY MESSAGES dat they didnt even kno who da sender was. whats more, there werent a few students believed da message nd as result THEY FAILED DA EXAMINATION, MEANING LOSING DA WORTH OF THEIR 3-year-sacrifice. how pathetic, they used dirty tricks on THEIR OWN JUDGEMENT DAYS which hold all da hardworks and efforts of their whole 3 years! NOT SO DIFFERENT FROM GAMBLING. dats lame, so wheres da value of all of their sacrifices? NOTHING, those sacrifices mean NOTHING when they hang their fate on da national examination nd dat goes fer us too. OUR nd OUR TEACHERS'SACRIFICES R WORTHLESS (when we r counting ourself on da national examination) IF DATS HOW IT IS.

    2nd, determining students' graduation from da result of national examination doesnt resemble da true spirit of study. y is dat? cuz i think we study bcause we wanna achieve our goals in da future. yah i kno theory is important, but sadly when it goes to NATIONAL EXAM, we'll aim to pass the exam as if we go to school juz to get good mark or maybe dis kind of thought will pop in our head "MY FUTURE DEPENDS ON DA RESULT OF DIS NATIONAL EXAM SO I CANT FAIL NO MATTER WAT". see da words NO MATTER WAT, i think dats da goal of da students who hav to fight fer their future by passing da national examination nd dat culd lead em to legalize any kinds of way whether they r good or not, as long as they can pass the exam wit gud marks, they wont care about it cuz none of us wants to fail nd waste our time nd sacrifices. i think dat doesnt resemble da true meaning of study at all.

    3rd, national examination cant be used to decide whether a certain student can pass or not cuz even if he/s can do well in da test by him/herslef nd he/s is a clever student in his/her school, but fer some reasons (can be a problem about da test sheet) he/s fails da test while the others pass it (dont care whether they cheated or not). AINT DAT UNFAIR? yah DATS UNFAIR...cuz though da gov made da same standard in national but da security system in each school isnt da same, so i can imagine how unfair dat is, PLAYING AROUND WIT MARKS as if studyin means nothing...

    now fer my conclusion, i think national examination shuld be abolished cuz it isnt an accurate device to decide whether a certain student can pass or not nd there r some useless impacts caused by it juz like wat r stated above. even if its impossible fer da gov to abolish da national examination, then da gov can continue it but shouldnt use it as da determiner of students graduation, so da gov can use da national examination only to measure da students' knowledge, not to determine their graduation. graduation should be determined by da daily learing results @school, its FAIR and FAR MORE ACCURATE.



    thank u.
    (A.A.Istri Eka_XIIA6_01)

    BalasHapus
  2. Yeah Sir, I've heard about that issue. I watched it on TV and heard a little from other people.
    Ok. Let me give my opinion about it!
    In my opinion, I'd say I agree if national examination should be abolished. Because, yes.. we know that many schools in Indonesia was judged by people because a few students there can't pass the examination. It's not fair to know that they've been studying hard there (I mean in the high school) since three previous years. How can we judge student's succes depends on (just) 6 days examination after they had studied hard for 3 years? It is not fair! The governmnt has a duty to make the justice change (rule). But, if they cared that it was not fair, they would change the rule and abolish the national examination! Wohoo...! ................but I think it's not to be.. T.T
    Aaaaaaaaand, don't forget about --------------- cheating! Many students didn't do their test themself (a lot of them I mean not at all). They joined with other students to do that, I mean cheating,, moreover they got the answers from their teacher! Haha... I know that'a a cliche reason but that's the FACT! (not at SMADA of course ^_^ LOVE U SMADA)
    So, the national examination should be ABOLISHED. I think it is like that. That's all. Thank you, Sir!

    EVI ANGGRAENI (XII.A6/13)

    BalasHapus
  3. Wow.. It is a controversial issue.. I have an opinion about it..

    I think, the national examination shouldn't be abolished.. Why? Because if there is no NATIONAL EXAMINATION, it will be same with the government make the students of Indonesia become more stupid..

    I mean, all of schools in Indonesia want their student to pass the national examination with a great mark.. So, if the national examination was abolished, i think, it would let all of the students pass the examination even though they get a bad mark for that examination..

    As we know that, it's impossible that there is school that want a few of their students or many students of their school can't pass the national examination because they get a bad mark.. It's embarrassing..

    In my opinion,somehow the national examination, have to be held.. And i think it is needed by the government to measure quality standard of education in national level, as you said.. But, it should have a precision to correcting them, in order to get a minimal number of the students that can't pass a national examination..

    I think that's all.. Thank's for your attention.. Wass.

    EVA PERMATA SARI XII.A6 - 11

    BalasHapus
  4. See, Sir? We have different Opinion! hahaha...

    BalasHapus
  5. Assalamu'alaikum ...

    For that statement, I guess it's true. But, it still cofuses me. I guess that the government reason/aim and the reason of some people who had said like that, is true. So, I mean that the reason of them/both is true. But, I'd thought it twice and actually I don't agree if National Exam have to be abolished. So, it can be said that I agree with the government "for this case." It's true that National Exam can be called as a tool to measure quality standard of education in national level. Cause the graduation system nowadays is different with the graduation system in the periode for long time ago which the graduation is definited/certained by each school in every town. So, I guess that National Exam is so suitable to judge whether a certain student can pass or not. Although, more people don't like it, I hope they can understand that it's for their/our best future and for our best education future. Although I guess that wish is so hard for them, but I believe that they can accept it well. K3y ...


    Vinda A.A. {XII.A5/35}

    BalasHapus
  6. Assalamualaikum.... This is my opinion about statement above :
    In my opinion, National Examination is better be continued than be cancelled. Because almost all of the senior highs in Indonesia have done very serious preparation to face it. So if the National Exam's cancelled, it would make some sides became disappointed. The teachers who have prepared some strategies, taught and trained their students with some exercises drill, will feel that their efforts are useless. As well as the teachers, the students will feel the same feeling too. However, there are some points that must be reviewed. Like the point of using NE result as the satndard of passing for 12th grade students. We cant use that result to measure the real capability of the students. So, the teachers who are involved in the teaching and learning activities must take part in determining the passing of the students. Because they are the only person who know the real capability of their students. I hope,, both the Education Minister and the BSNP can consider again the usage of NE result as a passing standard. May Allah gives us blessing, Jazakumullah Khoiron Katsiroh, Wassalam...

    (Abdurrazak baihaqi 12a6/02 a.k.a Ahly_DziQ'R)

    BalasHapus
  7. I think the National Exams must be held. Because basicly the senior highs have prepared a learning strategies to face it. So if the NE is deleted it will cause a disappointment, especially to the teacher and the student, like the students have to attend morning course, as well as the teachers. The teachers and students have to give the NE lessons a priority, so the other lessons just considered as a not-prior lessons.
    Even in the implementation, there are a lot of students are doing cheat, there are still some students who do it honestly. Beside that, The NE result can be determined as the passing satnadard of students. But don’t consider the NE result can determine the students success, because in doing it, almost all of the students are not doing it by theirselves, but there is a help from their friends.
    In addressing this, we cant just see it from the bad impact, but we have to see it from the good impact too, so I think the NE don’t have to be deleted because it will decrease the young generation’s quality

    Ahmad Firdaus 12a6-03

    BalasHapus
  8. ehmm....

    I think the national examination must be abolished. because, the passed of student just be judged in six day when national examination. we know, the students learn the lesson since 3 years ago,, it unnecessarry. and national examination make students do the crime. students get best score, because they do it together with their friends.
    Parent's of the student also think like that. the crime will be do in there. and for future, education will not be developed. the student's will be lose their self confidence...





    [HeRu_yuDha_DA (XIIA6/16)]

    BalasHapus
  9. Assalamu'alaikum ...

    Sir, I wanna add my comment above/before. I guess that it will be better if the graduation based on the result of The National Exam which combined by the school decision/the school judgement or the student's school decision/judgement. I mean that, not only the result of the National Exam that can judge whether a certain student can pass or not, but also the decision or the judgement of the student's school can judge whether the student can pass or not. So, both of them can be combined and also can complete each other to judge whether a certain student can pass or not. I think that's all of my comment and I hope no one furious with my comment, thank you ...

    Vinda A.A. {XII.A5/35}

    BalasHapus
  10. Assalamualaikum...

    In the name of Allah most gracious most merciful
    All praise and thanks are due to Allah
    Peace and blessing be upon to his Messenger...

    "Contoversy of National Examination"

    The statement above make PRO and CONTRA in the schooling world.

    In my opinion...

    I think National Examination should be abolished. WHY...???

    BECAUSE...

    FIRST...
    National exam should be conducted within the context of it's not as the final judge of graduation but more as national student and school's quality mapping. since it's unwise that the long process of years learning determined only by few days of national exam. The aim of learning result is not the destination but the odyssey of learning.

    SECOND...
    The cumulative passing grade system enable to be alternative scoring method because it is better than national exam. It's more comprehensive, accountable, and fair to decide the students' graduation. The teacher can monitor and evaluate students' learning progress during the process in order to determine the graduation

    THIRD...
    To improve our national pedagogical quality, the govt must take massive actions such as revise the curriculum, increase the teacher's salary, revitalize the national educational standards, reconstruct damaged school infrastructures, reevaluate the bestow of ineffective and inaccurate school grant projects, and most importantly more focused on students' moral building.

    I think that's all af my comment...

    THANK YOU

    NURMALASARI/XIIA6/25

    BalasHapus
  11. Sir...

    I wanna add my comment above...

    UN has huge negative impact for student’s psychology development in Indonesia. For example, a SMK’s student in Pontianak take a short way by killing himself because he didn’t pass UN ( kompas, Juni 2006)

    Means that just because student didn’t pass UN student must follow their senior high school for one year again… it’s useless,right???

    Our future is just decided for 6 day… where is Justice?? Every student have followed “pengayaan” and it takes long day.. and it’s useless when they didn’t pass.

    And how about among those days the student are sick...??? They must take the day that chosen for this situation.
    But not impossible that they are sick because they are tired with “pengayaan” and UN that takes 6 days continuosly.

    Whatever the situation whosoever face it.. but you have to Know friends.. if the psychology of people especially students here are distubeb... their hard study are gonna be useless.

    And because of that case ‘bout SMK’s student he had thougt that his work hard was useless ‘till he killed himself.

    I think that's all of my comment.

    Thank you

    BalasHapus
  12. Like my comment above..."UN has negative impact for student's psychology development especially in Indonesia", but besides that there are fact which make all of us open our eyes that UN should be abholised.

    Before it, I will ask you, "Do we really need National Exam?"

    For government, National Exam is aimed to maintain the quality of education nationwide and to set up the national standard for junior and senior high schools. For this reason, the previous administration insisted that National Exam could not be eliminated.

    However, the practice doesn’t sound as nice as that stated goal. It was reported that many students cheated in the exam. NOT ONLY STUDENTS, sometimes SOME TEACHERS were also reported helping their students to cheat. I think this humiliating practice occured because students were pushed to pass their education. Because the exam’s result influenced whether a student would pass his education or not, the students cheated in the exam in order to get good result. Besides, schools were also pushed to pass as many as possible their students because how many students they could pass and what the average result of the exam they could get determined their prestige and reputation among the public. For this reason, the schools demanded their teachers to help the students cheating in the exam.

    Because that, I think UN should be abholised than many STUDENTS and TEACHERS do not good action just to one statement "PASS UN". Our GOD will not like it....

    NURMALASARI/XIIA6/25

    BalasHapus
  13. Yeah sir ... !! NationaL examination is very famous in student's life.. every student's in Indonesia have known about it... and I reaLLy know about national examination..


    well, we can say that many people from different places disagree with national examination.. me, as a student have the same opinion... national examination must be deleted...!! why i say Like that ??

    First : we have to study at schooL for six years, and our destiny as a student depends on a week !! it's not fair !!

    second : the result from natinal examination is unreal.. maybe just a few students get the real score. why?? because there are many kinds of trick to do national examination.. like cheat, sending SMS each other.. maybe there are some teachers give the answers of national examination question... it's terrible, right?? we can learn from the case happened in SMAN 02 ngawi... It's one of the evidence of the failed of national examination for students, and maybe for teacher...


    maybe those are my opinion about national examination... so, i think national examination should be abolished... tHankz...


    Lorensa Virgiana / XII A-6 / 18

    BalasHapus
  14. asslamualaikum.. wr.. wb...


    owke,, i will give my opinion abou the statement above,,,


    i think it will be better that there is NO national examination in the school...

    why???????

    it's not fair for us as a student... because we have atudied in senior high scool in "3 years".., we have lost our time, energy, money, etc... but we will be judge whether we pass from senior high scgoll just with the result of NE.. and it is held just in "six days"... i repeat.. just in "six days"... "six days"...


    waoooow.... is it fair???????
    (3 years = 365 days...)

    of course,,, the answer is "No"

    the ratio is (365:6)
    the ratio is very far, isn't it?


    beside that.. in NE, the students use many bad tricks.., such as cheating with their friends...
    and of course.. their score is imitation... it's not the real score....
    how do we judge if we pass or no????
    in fact... the score is not real...



    so.. i can conclude that the National Examination should be abolished because it's not fair for us...


    i think thats all.. thank you...

    wassalamualaikum.. wr..wb


    Nur Fitriyaningsih (XII.A6-24)

    BalasHapus
  15. @ Mr. tris.

    i think this motion is unclear. coz the regulation and condition for UAN 2010 totally different with the previous UAN.
    So, it make me confuse to argue

    BalasHapus
  16. assalamualaikum wr wb....

    yuuppzz Sir,,, i will give my opinion,,,

    I think it isn't fair if the students success is only from National Examination, because we will have studied in SMA almost 3 years, it isn't short time. we have learned everything, and too much problem was experienced by us. whereas, National Examination is only held in 6 days it isn't fair with 3 years that we have done if the students success is only from 6 days taht we sit in a hot chair to face National Examination.

    the credibility of NE is also doubt, becz we don't know about the integrity of the result. it's not sure that the students will do NE by their own ability, they can cheat with their friends. So, NE can't be a measurement of student's success.

    And if there is no certainty that the result of NE will be a standart competency of students to enter University. i think NE is useless for us.
    emmm,, beside that,, I disagree with furtherance of NE schedule becz it isn't good for students and their teachers, becz it can give a consequency that studying must be in a hurry. beside that, the coordination between NE schedule and SNMPTN schedule is still unclear, so students will be confused what they have to study...

    but, I also agree with Haqi's opinion.

    so, I conclude that NE is better be continued. but NE isn't a certainty of student's success. but just as a chart of education quality. and teachers must be involved to judge the success of their students....


    thanks...
    Mr. Sutrisno....

    keep smiLe...

    BalasHapus
  17. Hmmm...Ok,Let's we talk about National Examination (NE).


    National Examination is a Government's program for the students in the last level to measure quality standart of education in National level. One of the purpose of this program is to increase quality of Indonesian people, expecially for the students. But in fact, until this year Indonesia is unsuccesful all the NE's participant to pass 100%. Because f that, i'm disagree with NE.

    1st, NE is not effective for students. I think when the students doing NE, a lot of them doing unhonest activity like cheating to his/her friend. They want to get the best answer for their pass. And it is not pure quality from the students.

    2nd, NE is not efficient. In my opinion, NE needs a lot money and time to make question. And it needs an extra energy from begin until the and.

    3th, to know students' quality, it can doing in each school by school examination. I'm sure who know about students' quality is their teacher. With doing school examination, we know about thee really students' quality.

    4th, If we continue our study in hight institution, i think NE is not needed. We just need school report or doing test.

    5th, NE can disturb students' psychology. Many students will fell afraid with their examination. They think that they can pass or not. And when after the NE's report they are nt pass, they will get stress.

    In conclution, i am disagree with NE because it is not effective and efficient and also there are many bad impact from this. Beside that, it can dangerous students' soul. So that, NE sould be obolished.


    Thank you, my beloved teacher.

    >>D


    Dhea Widya Pratama ( XII S2/ 06 )

    BalasHapus
  18. I agree if the national examination removed.....
    And I have a few opinions:
    First, because the national examination did not appreciate teachers who have taught us for three years and we learn for three years. Second, because we do not know how our situation at the national examination, for example if we are sick at the time the national examination, we will not be able to do that examination properly. Third, because the national examination only see the results and do not see our behavior in school and the achievements we have gained during the school
    And my conclusion that the national examination should be abolished because it was not fair for us (students)



    (M. Fadhil I XII.A5 / 21)

    BalasHapus
  19. Mmmm... So hard to say, whether I agree or not..

    In my opinion, national examination is a measurement for every students whether they PROPER to face the next education grade OR NOT.. National examination also needed for each countries to raise quality of its people in future..

    But in this modern era, technology also play an important part in this drama.. For example handphone.. Students can fool with their phone by asking and answering some exam questions each other.. It can endanger the education quality and also hide the national examination truth..

    We all sure we want to reach maximum quality of our national education.. But if in realization was like that, I think the national exam is nonsense!

    Thanks..

    Aldion Cahya Imanda
    XII IS 2/03
    e-mail: dioncharm@ymail.com

    BalasHapus
  20. Ok

    I do not agree with this opinion because the national exam is something really important which is used as a benchmark of progress of education in Indonesia. In addition many large countries that use national exam. For example the United States also uses a national exam called the High School Assessment Program (HASP). In the HASP execution of all students no one spoke at all, should not bring mobile phones, if someone put their hand into the pocket they immediately removed from the room, teachers also should not be reading about the test if there is a teacher read the test, teacher teaching license revoked immediately. If the national exam in Indonesia carried out such that would not be cheating and the quality of education in Indonesia must be increased. Besides the national examination results should also not be used fully to determine a student's graduation, but also must consider the results of their study during the school. So that the national examination is only used to improve the quality of education in Indonesia is not used as a determinant of a student's graduation.

    And my conclusion is the national exam eliminated unnecessary because the national exam as a benchmark the quality of education in education in Indonesia so that Indonesia could be better.


    Hilman Syarif (XII A6/17)

    BalasHapus
  21. Assalamu'alaikum.....

    ok Sir...
    I'll give my opinion about the statment..
    I absoluty agree that the Nasional Examinaton should be abolished, because:
    first, in the Nasional Examination the student must work by himself, but in fact many students are dishonest, for example cheating with his/her friends to do the test.It's not good. The score the score they get is not the one they deserve.

    second,the score of the nasional examination is not enough to evaluate the student activities in school during the year.

    And I think score of the nasional examination is not the most important is to get high school diploma to enter University.so, the most important is to get your diploma and later to be succesful at the entrance exam for University.
    just a bridge..


    so, nasional examination should be abolished,,bcz not fair for students.

    I think enough.
    thank you^_^
    wassalam....


    eka_maya(XII A4/12)

    BalasHapus
  22. It is not fair to judge the student graduated based on the nasional examination.

    I agree with that statement. It is not fair when our fighting ,, our effort during 3 years in senior high school is useless when we failed in the nasional examinationwhich held only six days with cetain subject.

    When goverment just judge the students succes based on the nasional examination, It means that our middle test, our homework and our assigment which we had done till evening and made us lost our childhood and our right to have fun with our friends are useless.

    So, why we spent our time to study in the school every day if our graduated is not based our study during three years.

    As we know there are many students doing cheating during final examination and maybe some students were sick when nasional examination held.

    I hope the goverment knows the reality, and make a good decision for us.

    Thanks.



    Winda Safitri XII-A6 / 35

    BalasHapus
  23. I think it is not fair to judge the students' success based on the result of national examination. we know that there are a lot of reason to accept or refuse that statment, but I think it really unfair. Why???
    Not only examination's lessons which become the measure the students intellectual are important but also there are alot of something else must be measured.because of that the lessons which aren't included in national examination is considered not important with the students because they only focus ang too afraid with national examination's lessons.
    a lot of unhonesty in national examination. Example cheating between student when examination moreover the trade of examination text. that makes national examination does match with of examination which measure the student intellectual.
    Studying 3 years in high scholl is not important and unhonor. because the student's garduate is depend on national examination.
    I hope the governmet realize that national examination is not effective to jugde the students success.


    Ni'mah septi W. / XII A6_20

    BalasHapus
  24. An haris nofpriyanto XII.a4

    I like the topic and will be happy if that is abolìshed...

    My reason is..
    1. I agree with that statement because pass not only must pass the national examination but also from their mark in couple of day so that is will fear

    Second..
    Because we not guarante national examination clean from cheating

    Third..
    Because we know school's stardart,teacher's skill,student's skill,n facilities in each schoo is not same

    BalasHapus
  25. Favian Arsyi XIIA4-Rezpect

    I really happy if national examination be abolished forever in our loving country, Indonesia...
    I think national examination is very useless for Indonesia educational development...
    National Examination can't be use to measure quality standart education,,because National Examination isn't the way to make students stated into dilgent or clever student....
    National Examination is about lucky or unlucky student,,we can say that the position of the students in the class and who is the watcher of the National Examination is determine students graduating..
    And also,how if some students get an accident at the time when National Examination come,like they get sick,they have been breakup from their girlfriend/boyfriend,their parents death, and etc...
    National examination isn't the only way to make students graduated from their shool,,goverment can use School Final Examination to graduate their students...
    So,why the goverment still use National Examination??it's very complicated...

    BalasHapus
  26. Ass.Wr.Wb.

    Graduation should be determined by daily result in school. It is just because, the theacher who teach us everyday for 3 years, are know how is our capability in learning the subject and know well our behaviour because being smart is not enough if we dont have attitude.
    More over now we use KTSP as the curriculum, that involve the school to creat it. So not every school have the same content of curriculum. For example, the school in the downtown teach the food like pizza, spagheti, etc and the school in the suburb also teach about the food but with diferent menu like Gado-Gado, fried banana, etc. It is just because there are no pizza and spagheti in the suburb. So, if we use the national final examination to determined our graduation, i dont think so it can show the real result for the student.
    National final exam have the same question for all over the province. It is made by the teacher and others who live in the city. So the content of the question is about what they have teach in the city school, but how about the school in the suburb? Did they have the same content? I dont think so. That is why i really dissagre if our graduation is only based from the national examination.

    Thanks...
    wassalam,,,


    Maya Puspasari
    XII-S1/20

    BalasHapus
  27. i absolutely agree if national Examination be abolished. i have some reason for it.

    First, the result of national examination i think isn't fair, because many student who follow national examination answer the test by help from his friends. I believe all student in Indonesia doing the test not only with his ability, but also ask to his/her friend.
    Second, national examination can't be used to measure the educational quality because every school has different quality.
    and the last, The national examination cause many other problem. For example, there was a student killed himself because he didn't pass the examination.
    the other case is there were a student who was very smart. He had accepted in singapore university by PMDK way before national examination held. But he didn't pass national examination because he was ill when national examination held. So, he can't continue his study.


    I think that's all from me. Thanks
    wassalam

    Rohman Prayogi
    XII-A4_29

    BalasHapus
  28. mohammad ayub amirudin9 Desember 2009 pukul 05.48

    ok3 Sirrr

    I could disagree if UAN eliminated,because in determining a graduation is not required only one test. Therea are many other tests that can be used to determine of graduation, for example UAS,exam practice etc. I think the right to decide for graduate students is the teacher himself. The teacher knows the ability and behavior of each student. If the goverment continues to use national examination to determine a passing grade acording to our tutor hard work during these three years means nothing. Moreover, technological developments are now growing rapidly,with easy to followthe example students answers from their friends. Therefore, new regulations need to anticipate undersirable events. In addition to the most students are more likely to think that national examination ias a scary thing, this will effect the psychology of students and make student stress, coupled with the standart of students passing each year increased by the goverment. Students who every day are considered smart and capable do the problems which are given by the teacher, when faced national examination be stupid because of depression.

    At this time there are many debate about the national examination, which considers national examination there is no test to determine graduation and on the other hand said that national examination is not decisive for graduate students.

    So although a lot of controversy about it, we are expectd to be ready to face all possibilities that will happen.

    Mohammad Ayub Amirudin
    XIIA5 / 19

    BalasHapus
  29. السلام عليكم
    I will explain about my oponion.
    I disagree if UAN will still be held. Because, the graduation of the students is not important if UAN is celebrated by National, but enough just in school level. If UAN still celebrated for search the quality of National education, so that it's not important to be done every year. With some periods 3-5 years, its enough time to survey. In fact, the result of UAN up to now just stop in the survey level. The students ability to do the examination sure different, hung up with the condition in body and soul. How very misfortune if a student in UAN day he/she get sick, or the soul condition got stressed by the economics situation of his/her family. If they failed to complete the UAN examination, so they will be in trouble/great disaster. How high the value of daily exercises as long as now, it means nothing. That is why the daily exercises follow to be parameter of the pass of students, not only depend on UAN.
    I think that's all. Thank's

    Wassalamu'alaikum


    Felita Meilia (XII A6/14)

    BalasHapus
  30. M. BURHANUDDIN (XII.A.5/20)10 Desember 2009 pukul 02.35

    HOW ARE YOU SIR......
    I WAS CONFUSED RESPONSE THIS ISSUE OF NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS,MOST STUDENTS DID THE EXAM PHOBIA VIEW,THE FACT IS DUE TO EXCESSIVE PHOBIA TENDS TO BE DOWN IN THE NATIONAL EXAMS IS UNPREDICTABLE,WHICH USUALLY EXCEL IN THE CLASSROOM,IT FALLS IN VALUE, STUDENTS WHO LESS PROMINENT IN THE CLASS CAN BEAT A MORE CLEVER . SO I THINK THE NATONAL EXAM IS NOT EFFECTIVE.....
    THANK YOU SIR...

    BalasHapus
  31. Assalammu'alaikum...

    I don't agree with National Examination to judge the student pass or not. we know that student study in Senior High School during three years, but with National Examination that had just six days can judge the student.

    I think it is not fair for student. the teacher understand more about their student and inthe fact about National Examination is not fair. many student use handphone to cheating with his or her friends to get answer from them.Although National Examination keep by police, but it can not stop dishonest in National Examination.

    We don't know about our condition in the next time when we do our National Examination.If we have bad condition we can't pass the test. Although we have good mark in the daily test in the school, our government must be think about it. Any student had been accept by University, she or he is very clever, than he or she can't pass National Examination and lost her or his dream to study in her or his favorite University. is it fair for them? and the other student who their mark are not so good can pass his or her National Examination with many ways. in the fact many ways to pass National Examination, they are paper boom, giving the answer from the teacher to his or her student, etc.

    it show that the National Examination is not effective and to do it our government need much money. our government can not see the quality of student in Indonesia, because many wrong ways to do the National Examination and the information that the government get about National Examination is not accurate.

    Wassalam...

    Anita Herdiana
    XII_A4_07

    BalasHapus
  32. Assalamuaikum Wr.Wb

    Hi,Sir...
    I hope U're fine today....

    owh, it's confusing issue...
    so many opinion about it,,,
    well, I want to give my opinion too,hehe,,,


    I'm not totally agree if natinal test be abolished from learning...
    I've many argument about it,,

    1st,national test is very helpfull to know the ability of student during in learning. If there's no final test,so???how we know our skill??? it will be better if the goverment has a good way to overcome this problem.

    2nd,in the other side we know that the goverment isn't fair, the student who can't reach the standart score is jugded that he/she not graduated. I think the goverment didn't look our efford during 3 years in school...

    I don't know sir,,
    I'm still confuse about it...
    i think that's all...
    thank you...
    wass.....

    I hope we can succes in the future....
    amiinnnn.....^_^

    Novita Ida Agustina
    12.A4/24

    BalasHapus
  33. asslam....

    i strongly believe that Nasional Examination(NE) should be abolished from indonesia..because:

    first,NE can make studends study more hard and it can make them stress.because the studends just thinking about this examination and it can't make them enjoy.

    second, many studends do chat there.so, the score isn't the real score of each studends. the NE scorein SMA can't used to join to the University

    i think that's all...
    thank you sir...

    wassalam...
    :)

    BalasHapus
  34. uupz...sorry sir..this's my opinion

    Rindang Alfiah_XII.A4(27)
    asslam....

    i strongly believe that Nasional Examination(NE) should be abolished from indonesia..because:

    first,NE can make studends study more hard and it can make them stress.because the studends just thinking about this examination and it can't make them enjoy.

    second, many studends do chat there.so, the score isn't the real score of each studends. the NE scorein SMA can't used to join to the University

    i think that's all...
    thank you sir...

    wassalam...

    BalasHapus
  35. Assalamualaikum................

    I want to give my opinion about National Examination...
    I agree if UN will be erased... why?????????

    I don't like UN (hehe^^).. because it can make me (a student) stress... and can make my friend stress too... and also make all student from Indonesian stress
    UN just only a week and school 3 years and the the passing judgement a week.... it's no fair from student.
    and there are many negative think from student and because of it, I dissagree wit UN.

    deni dwi R / XII-a5 / 10

    BalasHapus
  36. assalamualaikum sir

    OK... I agree if UN must be erased...

    because UN can't judge passing...

    UN can make strees and i hate it very much....


    homework and test make students strees and so don't give UN too....


    Ok.. let's fight to against UN....

    Thank you sir...

    ririn fitriani / XIIA5/28

    BalasHapus
  37. National Examination abolished?i couldn't agree more...
    I think the national exam is neccesary abolished,because it's not comparablefor three years when our school,only six daysspecified for graduation...
    After all we know so far that may colored national examination cheating, for example the use of mobile phones to spread the answers..
    Cheating is done only to get passed the tittle and gain the recognition from the community that the school is the best school with his student earned value....
    Though not neccesarily high value obtained to determine success of national college entrance..
    So,better passing each school determined by its school. From there,national college can determine which school is the best....

    HARTININGTYAS_XIIA4_18

    BalasHapus
  38. Assalamu'alaikum Mr...

    Before, I tell about my opinion, I will tell meaning of National Examination. National Examination is one of test to know what that student can pass of the test or not.

    Ok, now, I will tell about my opinion. I agree if National Examination should be abolished. Why ? Because ....

    First, I think National Examination can make student (included me as student) be stress. Because, National Examination was add student burden. Whereas, in school, student has got task and test who has made them be stress. So, they can't play every day. Therefore, National Examination can make student be stress.

    Second, National Examination is not fair. Because, if ours condition is not healthy, so ours brain can't work in an optimum manner. So, our value became bad. That, very not fair for smart student. Especially they get good value every day. And National Examination is very not fair for student.

    Ok, I think that's all, and I hope government should be abolished National Examination. Wassalamu'alaikum....

    By : Yunitha Ratih A. / XII_A5 / 34

    BalasHapus
  39. The controversy of National final exam...
    For me,the national final exam is an effective way for the goverment and school to decide the student graduated.. Why? Because,todays the student doing cheating and other instan ways like SMS or others to get the best mark in order to pass the national final exam... For this condition,we can know that the student score in national final exam isn't the real score... So,the national final exam isn't the one way to judge the student graduated or not...

    Asihanti Rosita
    XII IA6-05

    BalasHapus
  40. I disagree with that statement because national examination very weighing against to student, how not, we are three year go through school and only determined during three day and also very high mean.Inquitable likely if just this situation remaint be let it.goverment ought to more thinking repeat to policy which have been made.
    Thanks for all........




    IRA FITHRIE RAMDHAYANIE
    (XII-A5 / 17)

    BalasHapus
  41. Assalmu'alaikum........

    In my opinion, I agree if National examination held, because altough there are many judment that this final examination can broken young generation because ao "CHAETING" case. But, in fact, there are many more student which is doing that examination whit honest and right way....

    Although national examination held, but the mark from this examination may not use to establish school graduation. Because, it's not fair for student that doing the exam with honestly. so the school garduation can dertemain by look up their mark from their daily in first, second and third grade....


    thankz 4 thee attention...

    TiTa EnEStYa_XIIA7_14

    BalasHapus
  42. national test can be more effective if goverment change the mechanism,,,,, and not abolish the national test,,, if national test is abolish it will make education system go down,

    BalasHapus
  43. Talking about national test, it's the big problem between teachers as field workers and goverment as decision maker.
    To my mind,national test is important if we look at the quality side, but it will be something terrible for students and teacher who have not been ready to face it. So the conclusion is let's introspect ourselves, and for goverment, please look at this problem deeply. tx.....

    BalasHapus
  44. all my students always do cheating "ber jamaah" supported by the hedmaster. oh My God. as a honorer teacher ofcource I can't do nothing. Damn The headmaster ! For his good reputation he sells all his students. he said to all people that there is no cheating in his school. I know and see this by myself. then I quit to be teacher

    BalasHapus
  45. I am sure that this also happend in other school. But then after the Exam The headmaster, Camat, Bupati ,Gubernur And also Mendikbud said..." There is no Cheating in NE ". it's really bullshit.

    BalasHapus
  46. Before we have NE we have meeting with all teachers. the headmaster said if we want to be succed we have to pay 25.000 per student to get " Conte an" then we collect the money from the student to pay the "key answer' that really happened. please be honest.... in your school all my brothers as teachers,... this happened too ?

    BalasHapus